A tu jest tom drugi:

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=nHf969HMv48C&pg=PP1&lpg=PP1&dq=Paradise+Rediscovered:+The+Roots+of+Civilisation&source=bl&ots=PpYhK6S4U0&sig=7KTR-uoic8J252lSyvOzU0Heo0Y&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Kvy2UobtIs6qhQfc04GQBQ&ved=0CGYQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=Paradise%20Rediscovered%3A%20The%20Roots%20of%20Civilisation&f=false

SŁAWA I CHWAŁA PIE-RUNOWI,
OBY JEGO BOSKA ŁASKA, MĄDROŚĆ I SIŁA, DODAWAŁA NAM SŁOWIANOM – JEGO DZIECIOM WYTRWAŁOŚĆ W NASZYCH WYSIŁKACH, KU PRZYWRÓCENIU NAM JEGO PRADAWNEJ SŁOWIAŃSKIEJ/INDOEUROPEJSKIEJ TRADYCJI!!!

Paradise Rediscovered: The Roots of Civilisation
By Michael A. Cahill

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=aCTHIbK43sUC&pg=PA142&lpg=PA142&dq=cucuteni-trypillian+culture+dna&source=bl&ots=jXOFFaSyeL&sig=xDo_1A7InNwIQKsrWODF5AyOc3o&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Juu2UsH7JcPDhAfIwoDIBw&sqi=2&ved=0CHAQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=cucuteni-trypillian%20culture%20dna&f=false

I jeszcze kopniaczek dla genetycznie wstrząśniętych i zmieszanych z bagnem własnych faszystowskich kłamst „czystej krwi” Germanów i innych skandynawskich Gotów i ich niewolniczych przestraszonych genetycznie polskich allo-allo…
PRAWIE KAŻDA REWOLUCJA I POWSTANIE TAPLA SIĘ WE KRWI, A TERAZ WŁAŚCIWIE W DNA! 🙂

http://vieilleeurope.wordpress.com/2011/02/06/eupedia-maciamo-y-dna-haplogroups-of-ancient-civilizations/

Eupedia / Maciamo : Y-DNA haplogroups of ancient civilizations
Posted on 02/06/2011 by Alex Imreh

http://www.eupedia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25163

The ancient Slavs: Present-day Eastern Slavs are descended from the ancient Kurgan culture of the Eurasian steppes. The Scythians were the branch of R1a that remained in the steppes of from whom modern Russians are descended (along with other haplogroups). Slavic Europeans belonged to haplogroup R1a and I2. Southern Slavs have a much higher proportion of I2 (notably in the Croatia). Eastern Europeans from the Danubian basin and the Balkans have also inherited a sizeable percentage of haplogroup E (and some G and T) from the expansion Neolithic farmers that started from northern Greece 7,000 years ago (Linear Pottery culture).
(…)
The ancient proto-Germanic people: The three main haplogroups associated with Germanic people are I1, I2b1 and R1b-U106. The latter is an old pre-Celtic branch of R1b mostly found around Frisia. These people are thought to have mixed with I1 people to form the ancient Germanic culture. In Scandinavia R1a is also quite common, although its presence could have predated a Germanic expansion from northern Germany, Denmark and southern Sweden.

Romans, Celts and Germans: Celtic, Italic and Germanic people are all descended from the same R1b1b2 stock. They split north of the Alps.
The Italic branch went south and mixed with the Terramare people who were I2a, G2a and E-V13. Northern Italians have more Indo-European Celto-Italic blood, while southern Italian have more indigenous blood (the highest being Sardinia, then Basilicata).
The Germanic branch moved north and mixed with the indigenous I1 and I2b people, who had already mixed with R1a migrants from the Corded Ware (Battle Axe) culture. The new hybrid Germanic people retained the highest percentage of aboriginal haplogroup I.
Celtic people split in several groups : the Brythonic went to Britain and Ireland, the Gaulish to France, the Iberian to Spain and Portugal, and the Alpine remained around Austria, Switzerland, southern Germany, Eastern France and Belgium. The Iberian and Gaulish groups mixed with I2b, I2a and E people, the Alpine with I2b and E, and the Brythonic just with I2b people.

http://eurogenes.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/neolithic-mtdna-h-genomes-bell-beaker.html
Neolithic mtDNA H genomes + Bell Beaker Culture origins in Iberia

This Brotherton et al. paper confirms latest archeological and anthropological findings that the Bell Beaker Culture expanded from the Iberian Peninsula. However, it seems the authors are somewhat befuddled by these results, and attempt to explain them in the following way:

The genetic affinities between Central Europe’s Bell Beakers and present-day Iberian populations (Fig. 2) is striking and throws fresh light on long-disputed archaeological models3. We suggest these data indicate a considerable genetic influx from the West during the LNE (Late Neolithic). These far-Western genetic affinities of Mittelelbe-Saale’s Bell Beaker folk may also have intriguing linguistic implications, as the archaeologically-identified eastward movement of the Bell Beaker culture has recently been linked to the initial spread of the Celtic language family across Western Europe39. This hypothesis suggests that early members of the Celtic language family (for example, Tartessian)40 initially developed from Indo-European precursors in Iberia and subsequently spread throughout the Atlantic Zone; before a period of rapid mobility, reflected by the Beaker phenomenon, carried Celtic languages across much of Western Europe. This idea not only challenges traditional views of a linguistic spread of Celtic westwards from Central Europe during the Iron Age, but also implies that Indo-European languages arrived in Western Europe substantially earlier, presumably with the arrival of farming from the Near East41.
(…)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaker_culture

(…)
Origins
There have been numerous proposals by archaeologists as to the origins of the Bell Beaker culture, and debates continued on for decades. Several regions of origin have been postulated, notably the Iberian peninsula, the Netherlands and Central Europe.[8] Similarly, scholars have postulated various mechanisms of spread, including migrations of populations (“folk migrations”), smaller warrior groups, individuals (craftsmen), or a diffusion of ideas and object exchange.[9]

Recent analyses have made significant inroads to understanding the Beaker phenomenon, mostly by analysing each of its components separately.[10][11] They have concluded that the Bell Beaker phenomenon was a synthesis of elements, representing “an idea and style uniting different regions with different cultural traditions and background.”[12]

Radiocarbon dating seems to support that the earliest „Maritime” Bell Beaker design style is encountered in Iberia, specifically in the vibrant copper-using communities of the Tagus estuary in Portugal around 2800-2700 BC and spread from there to many parts of western Europe.[3][13] An overview of all available sources from southern Germany concluded that Bell Beaker was a new and independent culture in that area, contemporary with the Corded Ware culture.[14][15]
(…)
These hypotheses appear to be corroborated by more direct evidence from ancient DNA. For example, Early Neolithic Y-DNA from Spain did not reveal any R1b, but rather E-V13 and G2a,[87] whilst a similar study from a French pre-Beaker Neolithic site revealed haplgroup G2a and I-P37.[88] It is only later, from a German Bell Beaker site dated to the third millennium BCE, that the first evidence for R1b is detected. Ancient Y-DNA results for the remains of Beaker people from Iberia have yet to be obtained.

Whilst Cruciani, Belaresque and Arredi support a spread of R1b from South-Eastern Europe, Klyosov (2012) postulates that „Western European” R1b-L150 entered Europe from Northern Africa, via Iberia, coincident with the spread of the Bell Beaker culture.[89]
(…)

Przyzwyczajcie się all-allo wszelkiej maści, bo to uczucie posiadania odbitej podeszwy słowiańskiego R1a buta na twarzy, jeszcze wróci do was wielokrotnie i już wam tak niestety zostanie… hehehe.
Genetyka wdeptuje was sama w wasze germańsko-faszystowskie bagno, które sami sobie niewolniczo zgotowaliście!

P.S.
Wygląda na to, że R1a przyszło do Polski jak i do Niemiec i Skandynawii itd z terenów Prypeci także… W tym musze zwrócić wam honor… tyle tylko, że stało się to z 10.000 lat wcześniej!!! HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!! HITLER KAPUT!!!

http://polishgenes.blogspot.com.au/2012/03/northwest-eurasians-southwest-eurasians.html

(…)
Perhaps the simplest and most diplomatic thing to do for the time being, would be to associate the entire Northwest Eurasian group with an early (Neolithic) spread of Indo-European languages from somewhere on the border between West Asia and Europe? I know that would work for a lot of people, specifically those who’d like to see an Indo-European urhemait in Asia, as opposed to Europe. But it wouldn’t work for me, especially not after taking a closer look at that map above.
(…)
That’s my take on what the data is showing, and other explanations are possible. But I don’t really know what they might be? I should also mention that the potentially proto-Indo-European Baltic cluster shows a remarkable correlation with the spread of Y-chromosome haplogroup R1a, and ancient DNA rich in this haplogroup from supposed early Indo-Europeans. For more info on that, see the links below:

Best of 2008: Corded Ware DNA from Germany
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com.au/2008/12/best-of-2008-corded-ware-dna-from.html

Ancient Siberians carrying R1a1 had light eyes
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com.au/2009/05/ancient-siberians-carrying-r1a1-had.html

Ancient Siberians carrying R1a1 had light eyes – take 2
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com.au/2009/05/ancient-siberians-carrying-r1a1-had_24.html

Bronze Age Tarim Basin „Caucasoids” carried R1a1 (and European mtDNA lineages too)
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com.au/2010/02/bronze-age-tarim-basin-caucasoids.html

European admixture in ancient East Asians (aka. two-rooted canines carried by early Indo-Europeans to China)
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com.au/2011/10/european-admixture-in-ancient-east-asia.html

http://polishgenes.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/r1a-and-r1b-as-markers-of-proto-indo.html

Monday, April 15, 2013
R1a and R1b as markers of the Proto-Indo-European expansion: a review of ancient DNA evidence

Y-DNA haplogroup R1a is arguably the best candidate for a genetic signal of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, who are thought to have expanded across Eurasia during the Copper Age. It’s been characterized as such in several academic papers during the past 15 years, and the theory now looks more plausible than ever thanks to recent discoveries about its structure and phylogeography (for example, see here and here). Moreover, it’s been found in numerous ancient remains supposedly belonging to early Indo-Europeans.

R1a’s brother clade, R1b, has also been proposed as a marker of the Proto-Indo-European dispersals, mostly by hobby genetic genealogists on various online forums. Among other things, they argue that it shows a high correlation with the so called Centum Indo-European languages, and probably expanded rapidly across Europe at exactly the right time (ie. during and/or after the Copper Age). However, there are also several problems with this theory, such as the fact that R1b is the dominant Y-DNA haplogroup in one of Europe’s few non-Indo-European speaking groups, the Basques. Moreover, there is very little R1b in South Asia – where the early Indo-Europeans are thought to have arrived en masse from Central Asia during the early Iron Age – and much of that can be explained by historic Turkic incursions anyway.(…)

http://polishgenes.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/prehistoric-scandinavians-genetically.html
Friday, April 27, 2012
Prehistoric Scandinavians genetically most similar to modern Poles

Scientists from Uppsala University have managed to extract genome-wide markers from the early Neolithic remains of three hunter-gatherers and one farmer from southern Sweden. They only pulled a few thousand SNPs from each sample, but that was enough to successfully compare the ancient remains to modern Europeans. The results of their study, published in Science Magazine today, reveal that Poles top the allele sharing list with the the hunter-gatherers. Interestingly, Poles also show higher allele-sharing with the farmer than Swedes do, but not as high as Cypriots and Greeks. The figure below illustrates this clearly.(…)

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/336/6080/466.abstract

Science 27 April 2012:
Vol. 336 no. 6080 pp. 466-469
DOI: 10.1126/science.1216304

Report

Origins and Genetic Legacy of Neolithic Farmers and Hunter-Gatherers in Europe

Abstract

The farming way of life originated in the Near East some 11,000 years ago and had reached most of the European continent 5000 years later. However, the impact of the agricultural revolution on demography and patterns of genomic variation in Europe remains unknown. We obtained 249 million base pairs of genomic DNA from ~5000-year-old remains of three hunter-gatherers and one farmer excavated in Scandinavia and find that the farmer is genetically most similar to extant southern Europeans, contrasting sharply to the hunter-gatherers, whose distinct genetic signature is most similar to that of extant northern Europeans. Our results suggest that migration from southern Europe catalyzed the spread of agriculture and that admixture in the wake of this expansion eventually shaped the genomic landscape of modern-day Europe.

Zobaczcie koniecznie ten blog i poczytajcie komentarze, zwłaszcza pod tym artykułem.
Wiem, wiem, że to po angielsku, niestety nic na to ie mogę poradzić. Używajcie google translatora, jeśli musicie.

http://polishgenes.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/near-eastern-origin-of-ashkenazi-r1a.html

Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Near Eastern origin of Ashkenazi Levite R1a

W komentarzach pod tym artykułem pojawia się sugestia pochodzenia tego R1a od Mittani… I na przykład Lewici = Lechici? Wszystko co jest pustynną tradycją, zostało zapożyczone i wypaczone… już chyba widać od kogo i kiedy…

Przypominam że Lewitą był tzw. Moses (TutMoses). Is-tory-jkę o nim i jego wyczynach zamieściłem pod artykułem o byku który płakał idąc na rzeź jak i pod kolejnym artykułem w odpowiedzi na komentarz z blogu Livii Ether. Tam jest wszystko czarno na białym.

Pustynna tradycja to jak widać jedno wielkie kłamstwo i manipulacja. Teraz chyba dla każdego jest oczywiste,dlaczego te mieszańce z niewiadomo skąd nas Słowian R1a potomków PIE, tak nienawidzą.
I to dlatego zakłamany NG nie zamieścił ani słowa o Mitologii Słowian, kiedy wydawał swoją książkę o mitologiach świata… Czerwone tarcze już o to „zadbały”, tak samo jak „zadbały” o wiele innych rzeczy…

P.S.
Czy teraz mieszają w genetyce? Tak tylko retorycznie pytam…

W POLSCE mówi się i pisze po polsku”-Tylko że internet jest na świecie,a nie tylko w Polsce 😉

Rozumiem, że nie rozumiesz po angielsku i nie rozumiesz po co zamieściłem te cytaty, ok.
Jak byś posłuchał Pana Czesława i sobie to wkleił do google translatora, to byś może też zrozumiał po co zamieściłem to co zamieściłem. To nie lenistwo, to dowód. A oto tłumaczenie tylko pierwszego zdania.

„Według projektu Genographic przeprowadzonego przez National Geographic Society, organizacji finansowanej przez rodziny Rothschildów, Haplogrupa R-M124 powstał O 25.000 lat temu w Azji Środkowej [4], a jej członkowie wyemigrowali na południe, w ramach drugiego [5] poważnej fali migracji ludzi w Indiach. [6]”

Jak sobie przetłumaczysz resztę, to może pojmiesz znaczenie tego co zamieściłem.
Nic do ciebie nie mam, ale nie ograniczaj się tylko do j. polskiego bo ci może wiele umknąć…