<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Komentarze do: Racjonalista.pl: 1. Henry Miller, Sexus (1949); 2. W XVII wieku język polski był językiem międzynarodowym; 3. Wanda Gizbert-Studnicka &#8211; Czy język polski jest piękny?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bialczynski.pl/2020/07/15/racjonalista-pl-1-henry-miller-sexus-1949-2-w-xvii-wieku-jezyk-polski-byl-jezykiem-miedzynarodowym-3-wanda-gizbert-studnicka-czy-jezyk-polski-jest-piekny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bialczynski.pl/2020/07/15/racjonalista-pl-1-henry-miller-sexus-1949-2-w-xvii-wieku-jezyk-polski-byl-jezykiem-miedzynarodowym-3-wanda-gizbert-studnicka-czy-jezyk-polski-jest-piekny/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=racjonalista-pl-1-henry-miller-sexus-1949-2-w-xvii-wieku-jezyk-polski-byl-jezykiem-miedzynarodowym-3-wanda-gizbert-studnicka-czy-jezyk-polski-jest-piekny</link>
	<description>oficjalna strona Czesława Białczyńskiego</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:52:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Autor: Białczyński		</title>
		<link>https://bialczynski.pl/2020/07/15/racjonalista-pl-1-henry-miller-sexus-1949-2-w-xvii-wieku-jezyk-polski-byl-jezykiem-miedzynarodowym-3-wanda-gizbert-studnicka-czy-jezyk-polski-jest-piekny/#comment-62459</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Białczyński]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bialczynski.pl/?p=107701#comment-62459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[W odpowiedzi do &lt;a href=&quot;https://bialczynski.pl/2020/07/15/racjonalista-pl-1-henry-miller-sexus-1949-2-w-xvii-wieku-jezyk-polski-byl-jezykiem-miedzynarodowym-3-wanda-gizbert-studnicka-czy-jezyk-polski-jest-piekny/#comment-62458&quot;&gt;Unicorn&lt;/a&gt;.

Tak, czytałem, znowu dobry artykuł, ale koniecznie z komentarzem. Niestety brak czasu.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W odpowiedzi do <a href="https://bialczynski.pl/2020/07/15/racjonalista-pl-1-henry-miller-sexus-1949-2-w-xvii-wieku-jezyk-polski-byl-jezykiem-miedzynarodowym-3-wanda-gizbert-studnicka-czy-jezyk-polski-jest-piekny/#comment-62458">Unicorn</a>.</p>
<p>Tak, czytałem, znowu dobry artykuł, ale koniecznie z komentarzem. Niestety brak czasu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Autor: Unicorn		</title>
		<link>https://bialczynski.pl/2020/07/15/racjonalista-pl-1-henry-miller-sexus-1949-2-w-xvii-wieku-jezyk-polski-byl-jezykiem-miedzynarodowym-3-wanda-gizbert-studnicka-czy-jezyk-polski-jest-piekny/#comment-62458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unicorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bialczynski.pl/?p=107701#comment-62458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[http://oldeuropeanculture.blogspot.com/2020/07/bogatyr.html

&quot;Apparently some linguists have found it difficult to accept Bagatur = Bagadar because of the fact that Iranian laguages don&#039;t have &quot;dar&quot; as meaning &quot;given, gift&quot;. Sanping Chen lists the Indo-European languages considered as possible sources for the &quot;given, gift&quot; part in Bagatur as Pali/Sanskrit &quot;-datta&quot;, Iranian &quot;-dāta&quot; and Ancient Greek &quot;-doros&quot;...And proposes that the term Bagatur = Bagadar was an Iranian-Greek compound...

Now, even though compounds like these are possible, and recorded, it is strange that one group of Indo-European languages which has both baga and dar is missing from the Above list: Slavic, the only languages, appart from Turkic languages, where we find the term Bogatir meaning a knight, a hero...

In Slavic languages Bog = God, da = give, dade = gave, dan = given, dar = gift...Bogdan is a personal name meaning God given. Božidar is a personal name meaning God&#039;s gift...

And the expression &quot;Boga dar&quot; still means God&#039;s gift... 

But there surely couldn&#039;t have been any Slavs knocking about Chinese northern borders during the Bronze and Iron Age, right? Well, who knows...Maybe. Or maybe, again, Slavs have preserved in their language all the versions of the old PIE root &quot;*deh₃-&quot; to give, which are now strewn across IE spectrum in fragments...And the word for god, Bhaga...&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://oldeuropeanculture.blogspot.com/2020/07/bogatyr.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://oldeuropeanculture.blogspot.com/2020/07/bogatyr.html</a></p>
<p>&#8222;Apparently some linguists have found it difficult to accept Bagatur = Bagadar because of the fact that Iranian laguages don&#8217;t have &#8222;dar&#8221; as meaning &#8222;given, gift&#8221;. Sanping Chen lists the Indo-European languages considered as possible sources for the &#8222;given, gift&#8221; part in Bagatur as Pali/Sanskrit &#8222;-datta&#8221;, Iranian &#8222;-dāta&#8221; and Ancient Greek &#8222;-doros&#8221;&#8230;And proposes that the term Bagatur = Bagadar was an Iranian-Greek compound&#8230;</p>
<p>Now, even though compounds like these are possible, and recorded, it is strange that one group of Indo-European languages which has both baga and dar is missing from the Above list: Slavic, the only languages, appart from Turkic languages, where we find the term Bogatir meaning a knight, a hero&#8230;</p>
<p>In Slavic languages Bog = God, da = give, dade = gave, dan = given, dar = gift&#8230;Bogdan is a personal name meaning God given. Božidar is a personal name meaning God&#8217;s gift&#8230;</p>
<p>And the expression &#8222;Boga dar&#8221; still means God&#8217;s gift&#8230; </p>
<p>But there surely couldn&#8217;t have been any Slavs knocking about Chinese northern borders during the Bronze and Iron Age, right? Well, who knows&#8230;Maybe. Or maybe, again, Slavs have preserved in their language all the versions of the old PIE root &#8222;*deh₃-&#8221; to give, which are now strewn across IE spectrum in fragments&#8230;And the word for god, Bhaga&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
