Odkryto piramidę na dnie Atlantyku

Na dnie Oceanu Atlantyckiego, pomiędzy wyspami archipelagu Azorów, odkryto budowlę o kształcie piramidy. Jej szczyt znajduje się 40 metrów pod powierzchnią wody.

Podwodna piramida została odkryta w połowie września br. przez azorskiego wędkarza sportowego pomiędzy wyspami Sao Miguel i Terceira. Budowla o wysokości około 60 m, rozpościera się na obszarze o powierzchni 8 tys. m2.

– Odkrycie nastąpiło podczas jednej z moich wypraw, gdzie do poszukiwania dogodnych obszarów do łowienia ryb wykorzystywałem zintegrowany system batymetryczny. Odczytałem na nim obecność dziwnej podmorskiej budowli – relacjonował Diocleciano Silva.

Zdaniem odkrywcy podmorskiej piramidy tajemnicza budowla może być pozostałością mitycznej Atlantydy, prastarej krainy na Atlantyku, zniszczonej, według legend, przez liczne trzęsienia ziemi i zalanej przez wody oceaniczne.

Naukowcy z Wydziału Oceanografii i Rybołówstwa Uniwersytetu Azorskiego choć sceptycznie podchodzą do tej tezy, to w wydanym komunikacie przyznają, że pracownicy uczelni rozpoczęli już prace związane ze zbadaniem odkrytej piramidy.

Do pomocy naukowcom w analizie tajemniczego obiektu skierowana została również jedna z jednostek portugalskiej marynarki wojennej. Jej dowództwo odmawia jednak komentarzy na temat prowadzonej na Azorach akcji badawczej.

– Obliczenia pozyskane z systemu batymetrycznego wskazują, że budowla została najprawdopodobniej wykonana przez człowieka. Ma niezwykle geometryczne kształty. Obiekt ze względu na swój wyjątkowy format mógł w przeszłości pełnić funkcję jakiegoś systemu obronnego – dodał Silva.

~Toro [godzinę temu]
W 2011 roku powstał (po kilkunastu latach badań) film dokumentalny o piramidach w Egipcie. Z filmu jednoznacznie wynika, ze piramid nie mogli wybudować Egipcjanie ze względu na nieprawdopodobne spietrzenie komplikacji technicznych i technologicznych, szczegółowo wymienionych i omowionych jedna po drugiej. W filmie wypowiadają się nie tylko historycy ale rownież (i przede wszystkim) inżynierowie, geolodzy, architekci i inni specjaliści, którzy komentują każdy z aspektów konstrukcji piramid. Film z gatunku „game changer”.czas pisać nowe podręczniki historii, sek tylko w tym, ze nie wiadomo kto te piramidy faktycznie zbudował i jak. Artykuł na ten temat plus cały film na http://www.unacknowledged.info Tytuł artykułu „Who built the pyramids”. Polecam.

~mes [5 godzin temu]
kolejny dowód na to, że przed nami istniała na ziemi inteligentna cywilizacja, którą po prostu zmiótł z ziemi jakiś kataklizm. Polecam świetny dokument na ten temat „revelations of piramids”. Jest masa dowodów na to, że wszystkie piramity wskazują cykl kolejnego ( wielki zegar astronomiczny) katalizmu i były budowane w taki spobób, aby mogły owe katalizmy przetrwać. Jest jeszcze maaasa rzeczy do odkrycia :). Na prawdę gorąco polecam i pozdrawiam.

~423324 [4 godziny temu]
@dfgs ^ a świstak siedzi i zawija w sreberko…

~szary ludek [3 godziny temu]
@dfgs ^ A może są w Watykanie w piwnicach lub w archiwach iluminatów i reszty popaprańców.Nie pacz tylko w dół. Podnieś głowę do góry,a zobaczysz że na niebie są gwiazdy.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Early-Slavs-Culture-Medieval/dp/0801439779/ref=pd_sim_sbs_b_8

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Russian-Myths-The-Legendary-Past/dp/0714127434/ref=pd_sim_sbs_b_9

Przepraszam, pomylilem recenzje. Ta ma byc do tej na ksiazki na gorze, a tamta z gory do tej na dole.

This review is from: Encyclopedia of Russian and Slavic Myth and Legend (Paperback)
When one is interested in the myths and legends of a culture, a good mythological encyclopedia is, in my opinion, a must, as a general reference work alongside the actual stories themselves. This one is amazing, the entries are complete, with reference to the country of origin of the character or story (the work covers most of Eastern Europe, a huge area), and full and detailed entries and the book is extremely readable for an encyclopedia. I own many encyclopedias of various mythologies and this is one of the best, both in the ammount of information and readability. Well worth a look, especially as Eastern European Mythology is so rich and little known.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Slavic-Folklore-Handbook-Greenwood-Handbooks/dp/0313336105/ref=pd_sim_sbs_b_1

I jeszcze cos o smokach, dla zwolennikow smokow:

http://www.abebooks.com/Giants-Monsters-Dragons-Encyclopedia-Folklore-Legend/9319321757/bd

A ja znalazlem cos o Mitologii Slowianskiej… Jednak toto istnieje…:

http://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-Russian-Slavic-Myth-Legend/dp/1576070638

This review is from: Slavic Folklore: A Handbook : A Handbook (Greenwood Folklore Handbooks) (Hardcover)
I bought this book since I was very interested in learning about the Slavic history, mythology, rituals and folklore in general. When it arrived I realised to my own surprise that it’s strong cover made it look beautiful and durable and so I started reading the contents with great enjoyment.

Kononenko manages to give us a very clear image of the pre-Slavic tribes that inhabited the Russian lands, Ukraine and the northern Balkans, even if the myths and stories of these tribes have been written down to only a small number of sources that have been preserved until our era. She has definately searched a lot, in order to find all this information.

About the more modern Slavic practics, the book has great examples of stories, poems and epics, they help the reader understand how those people think and also shows him/her how the Slavic cultures affected the western culture or were affected by it.

The only drawback of this book is that it focuses too much on the Russian and Ukrainian folklore, mainly because of the writer’s backround. If this book has a little more information about other Slavic groups, like the South Slavs, Polish and Czechoslovakian, it would be a real treasure.

I Tematyczna Encyklopedia Mitow do poczytania sa tam np. Bakuba, Koriakowie i inne dziwne ludy… Ciekawe, czy jest tam cos o Slowianach… Niechyba jednak nic…hehehe

Myths of the World: A Thematic Encyclopedia, Jordan, Michael

http://pl.scribd.com/doc/4848637/Jordan-Michael-Myths-of-the-World-A-Thematic-Encyclopedia

TO W KONCU JAK JEST?
ISTNIEJE TA MITOLOGIA SLOWIAN/INDOEUROPEJCZYKOW CZY NIE?
WIETA, CZY NIE WIETA?
JEST TA WEDA , CZY JEJ NI MA?

Cytat z tej ksiazki:
(…)
The word “magic” derives (by way of Greek and Latin) from the old Persian term maguš, the word for the Zoroastrian and pre-Zoroastrian Persian priests and sorcerers (the familiar latin plural of the word is magi, they of manger pilgrimage fame in Matthew 2:1).
(…)

Sugeruje ja poczytac, kto zna angielski…, moze sa i polskie tlumaczenia…

Film hamerykanski, o Sielance i palacu jednego z krolow.
Jest na tym filmie pokazany pewien pisarz, ktory napisal niby „Encyklopedie mitow ziemskich”…

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=I9W4Hlx4_VEC&pg=PT5&lpg=PT5&dq=richard+leviton+encyclopedia+of+earth+myths&source=bl&ots=RNNnvvOFtg&sig=IAJ_TSGnzs5YaVyevu9YYtfGHPA&hl=en&sa=X&ei=yJtEUrv6BNC3hAe32oCoAg&ved=0CG0Q6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=richard%20leviton%20encyclopedia%20of%20earth%20myths&f=false

Sami zobaczcie, jaki jest on szczegolowy i dokladny i obiektywny jednoczesnie, 158 mitow z 21 kultur…… Jest tak szczegolowy i dokladny i precyzyjny jak NG, ktore o Mitoligii Slowian/Indoeuropejczykow, nie zajaknelo sie nawet jednym slowem… Ale ale, sa tam jakies znane postacie… zobaczmy pierwsza z brzegu – Adam… i mamy uczone politycznie poprawne pierdu pierdu… Nie ma tam nic np.o Adamu… pierwowzorze dla tego bardziej znanego gawiedzi, tzw. pierwszego czlowieka na Ziemi…hehehe…

http://www.mega.nu/ampp/eden/roots.html

(Prosze zwrocic uwage, na liczne przyklady zapozyczen z tak niechetnie wspominanej Tradycji Indoeuropejskiej, dokonanych daaaaawno temu, przez tzw. Hebrajczykow, (kimkolwiek oni nie byli, za znawca tematu Ezechielem)!!! Oczywiscie nie laczy sie znow Slowian z Indoeuropejczykami… (Jesli juz, to oczywiscie laczy sie z nimi jedynie prawdziwych i prawych, naszych ukochanych indogermanishe upper menchen, czystej krwi aryjskiej Hermanow…. jednojajecznych). Takie kolejne papu, pasza dla tych co nie chca sami szukac i czytac…

[…]

“Adamu” is the name in Sumerian mythology for the first man, created by “Enki”, the creator god and inventor of civilization. Adam is Hebrew for “man”, and adamah is a Hebrew word signifying dust and earth, and in Aramaic signifying blood. Havva — Hebrew for “Eve” — in Hebrew signifies life.

In the Sumerian myth, magical food is the source of immortality, not the source of its downfall, and Adamu is tricked to not eat it (the gods tell him it is poisonous), and thereby remains mortal. The Hebrew biblical account also describes such a life-giving magical food — the food of the “tree of life”, distinct from the forbidden “tree of knowledge of good and evil” — and it is chiefly to deprive them of the immortality bestowed by the fruit of the tree of life, that God exiles Adam and Eve from the garden. The tale of Cain and Abel (Genesis 4:1-16) parallels tales in Sumerian mythology of rivalries between farmer and herder gods.

Genesis 11:26-31 and 17:5-8 teach that Abraham himself, vaunted father of nations, is a native of the Sumerian city Ur (southeast Iraq, near the ancient mouths of the Tigris and Euphrates) under Chaldean suzerainty, growing up there some time in the second millenium BCE, and departing for Canaan (Israel and environs). Abraham’s father Terah adhered to the Sumerian mythology, and was a maker and seller of idols, but Abraham rejected polytheism and his father’s idols, and managed a remarkable escape from the Chaldean king’s sentence of death for his heresy. Joshua 24:2 records the break: “And Joshua said unto all the people, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of Nachor: and they served other gods.” In any case, the similarity of the Torah’s cosmogony to the Sumerian epic may be evidence that the biblical tales of Abraham are at least partially historical.

Monotheism was first consolidated in the nation of Judah by King Josiah (reigned ca. 641-609 BCE). But soon thereafter, the Chaldeans sacked Jerusalem and forced the Hebrews into exile in Babylon (597-538 BCE), under king Nebuchadrezzar II (605-562 BCE) and his successors. This captivity culminated in the syncretion of proto-Judaism with the Zoroastrianism of their Persian liberator, and the commitment of the Torah to writing. Zoroastrianism, founded ca. 750 BCE, is incidentally but one representative of the descendents of a common prehistoric Indo-European religion; among the other representative mythologies are Hindu, Norse, Greek, and Roman. Zoroastrianism contributes to the Eden myth the very word “paradise”, deriving from the Avestan (Old Persian) pairidaēza. This was the term used in Zoroastrian Persia to refer to the king’s enclosed garden parks. The Hebrew in Genesis 2:8 for “garden of Eden” is gan-be’Eden — gan signifies not just a garden, but a walled garden, and Eden is not just a proper name, but a Hebrew term for “delight”. The garden motif even draws direct inspiration from Nebuchadrezzar II, who (according to legend) built “hanging gardens” in Babylon to please his homesick wife Amyitis, daughter of Median king Cyaxares (625-585 BCE). The Medes commanded a vast and verdant pre-Persian, partly Zoroastrian empire east of Chaldea, and the marriage cemented an alliance of the two empires. In fact the Old Persian pairidaēza is believed to have its root in the Mede language, which was in any case quite similar to Old Persian and the other Indo-Iranian languages of the region.

It seems inescapable that, to arrive at the creation mythology articulated by the postexilic authors of Genesis, the Hebrews conflated their ancestral Sumerian cosmogony and cultural inheritance, tales of the Zoroastrian king’s idyllic garden in the east, and the Zoroastrian doctrine that the world created by Ahura Mazda was a paradise, spoiled by the evil Ahriman, but to be restored to its paradisiacal condition in the eschaton, as prophesied by Zoroaster. Before this syncretion, neither Satan nor the divine messiah (nor a great many other key doctrines) existed in the Judaic canon — all supernatural acts and promises were attributed directly to the covenant god Yahweh (or, before Josiah’s monotheistic edicts, to any number of gods in a heterodox pantheon).

Cyrus the Great
The Hebrews were surely inclined to sympathy with the Zoroastrian worldview, because it was the Zoroastrian king Cyrus the Great (reigned ca. 546 to 529 BCE), imperial uniter of the Medes and Persians, who delivered them from their Chaldean captivity, and instigated construction of the second Temple in Jerusalem. Isaiah 44:28-45:1 records a sympathy so great it smacks of open kinship: “That saith of Cyrus, He is my shepherd, and shall perform all my pleasure: even saying to Jerusalem, Thou shalt be built; and to the temple, Thy foundation shall be laid. Thus saith the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have holden, to subdue nations before him”. In 538 BCE, Cyrus commissioned the Judaic prince Sheshbazzar to lead the return to Jerusalem, and carry back the sacred vessels confiscated by the Chaldean empire at the start of the exile. As told in the first chapter of the Book of Ezra, the universal god of the Israelites and the universal god of Cyrus are the same god: “Thus saith Cyrus king of Persia, The LORD [“Yahweh”] God [“Elohim”] of heaven hath given me all the kingdoms of the earth; and he hath charged me to build him an house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah.” Under the patronage of the ardently Zoroastrian king Darius (reigned 521 to 485 BCE), Zorobabel (also transliterated Zerubbabel, as in the Book of Haggai) in ca. 520 BCE led another company of Babylonian Hebrews back to Jerusalem, assumed governorship of the city under royal dispensation, and completed the second Temple. Zorobabel is mentioned in Matthew 1:12-13 as a 29th generation lineal descendent of Abraham, and a tenth generation lineal ancestor of Joseph (husband of Mary, mother of Jesus of Nazareth), though this account is immediately suspect because it requires fifty year generations between Zorobabel and Joseph. In any case, in the immediate postexilic period, there is no clear boundary, either political or religious, between the Zoroastrian establishment and the tribes of Israel. It was during this period that the Torah was committed to writing. Moreover, the “wise men from the east” of Matthew 2:1, the pilgrims come to Israel to pay homage to the infant Jesus, are in fact emissaries of the Zoroastrian court of Persia (magi), come to honor the child they believe is the Zoroastrian messiah. Regardless of the historicity, this account continues the biblical pattern that considers messianic Judaism and Zoroastrianism to be the same religion. While it might be coincidental, the Star of David, now the centerpiece of the national flag of Israel, was an important symbol in Zoroastrian astrology.

At its mythological root paradise was almost certainly believed to be in the celestial heavens, coming to prehistoric earth only through narrative modification. The words for heaven and for paradise are the same in a great many euroasiatic languages, including the Indo-European languages, Hebrew, and Korean.

As Islamic scholars understand it, the Qur’an places Eden itself in heaven, so that it can only be reached through death (particularly, by martyrdom). Correspondingly, Islamic doctrine holds that the forbidden fruit of Eden was in fact ineffectual, and it was the devil who tempted a mortal Adam to eat it, telling him falsely that it would give him immortality, whereas his betrayal of god simply led god to eject him from paradise.

Thus there are three principal permutations of the myth. In the first, the Sumerian version, a mortal Adam is in an earthly Eden, and a life-giving fruit is not eaten, due to divine trickery. In the Judeo-Christian version, an immortal Adam is in an earthly Eden with two fruit trees, one giving the immortal life of a god, the other a forbidden one giving the vision of a god, eaten at the instigation of a diabolical serpent (divine trickery). In the Islamic version, a mortal Adam is in an ethereal Eden, and a false fruit is eaten at the instigation of the devil. The confusion of earthly and heavenly paradise recurs within and between the extant religious canons (including the Indic canons), facilitating acceptance of the Edenic movement’s promise of earthly paradise. For example, in America, some radicalized Muslims are explicit Edenists (this is the Taliyah movement, broached below in the Keeping Eden Green chapter). Though for utopians frank introspection and circumspection is generally alien, they stand to learn a great deal about their movement from an appreciation that in most of the world, for most of history, paradise has been associated with death, and in particular, with the end of life.